Slide background
Slide background

Journals come in both print and online editions. You can submit your articles by any one of the following three methods: 1. You can send the full papers/articles directly to our gmail id: issnjournals2u@gmail.com (Or) 2.Register/Login to Submit/Browse Journal & Events Listings with full control (Or) 3. Submit papers/articles without registration by clicking here.
For any assistance, please call/whatsapp us over our mobile numbers: +919245777148 / +919486068813

A DISCOURSE ON CONFLICT BETWEEN THE PRIMITIVE AND CIVILIZED, THE PURITAN AND NATURAL, AND THE MORAL AND IMMORAL HALVES OF THE SELF IN ANDRE GIDE’S 'THE IMMORALIST' (Pages 41-52) by Dr. Vishwas A Joshi in THE ENGLISH RESEARCH EXPRESS / ISSN:2321-1164 (Online); 2347-2642 (Print)

DV Updated
 
3.7
 
3.4 (1)
358 0 0 0 1 0

Journals

Please Login
To view the complete details of the Journal, please login.
Article Number
ERE.2014/2Nd.Qr-04/41.52/152
Publication Year

The paper deals with primordial conflict between the natural self and the made-up self. The attempt to pursue a life of instincts is investigated. The Puritan upbringing and traditional embedded values need to be unlearned first; and then one can hear the call of the Adam- an instinctive self. The shift from Puritan self to an instinctual one is supported by a severe illness; it compels Michel to focus on his body overtly; it arouses the Adam covertly. His reveling in the instinctual life, refusing the established institutions, and rejecting the traditional roles make him an ‘immoralist’. However, the author has not been judgmental regarding the conflict as he has left Michel with a question about his freedom; he has achieved the freedom but does not know what to do with it. Gide, though not justifying Michel’s behaviour, seems to be in his favor the way Milton is said to have been of Satan’s party. Key Words: Puritan, instinctive life, sincerity, Adam, the life of desires, freedom, immoral

Editor reviews

1 reviews

Reviewed by Editorial Board
(Updated: January 15, 2020)
Overall rating 
 
3.7
Expertise 
 
4.0
Relevancy 
 
3.0
Presentation 
 
4.0
Fulfills all criteria
Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0

User reviews

1 reviews

Overall rating 
 
3.4
Expertise 
 
4.0  (1)
Relevancy 
 
3.0  (1)
Presentation 
 
3.0  (1)
To write a review please register or
Reviewed by me alone
Overall rating 
 
3.4
Expertise 
 
4.0
Relevancy 
 
3.0
Presentation 
 
3.0
Please proceed further
DV
Report this review Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0
 
     
Forgot Login?   Sign up  

Choose Archives

advertise with us 1