Slide background
Slide background

Journals come in both print and online editions. You can submit your articles by any one of the following three methods: 1. You can send the full papers/articles directly to our gmail id: issnjournals2u@gmail.com (Or) 2.Register/Login to Submit/Browse Journal & Events Listings with full control (Or) 3. Submit papers/articles without registration by clicking here.
For any assistance, please call/whatsapp us over our mobile numbers: +919245777148 / +919486068813

ARUNDHATI ROY’S 'THE GOD OF SMALL THINGS' & KAMALA MARKANDAYA’S 'NECTAR IN A SIEVE' – AN ECOFEMINIST CRITIQUE WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO COMMODIFICATION & IMPERIALISM (Pages 98-110) by Ms. Komal Raichura in THE ENGLISH RESEARCH EXPRESS / ISSN:2321-1164 (Online); 2347-2642 (Print)

MK Updated
 
3.6
 
3.4 (1)
432 0 0 0 1 0

Journals

Please Login
To view the complete details of the Journal, please login.
Article Number
ERE.2014/1St.Qr-11/98.110/114
Publication Year

The political economy of the imperialism has subverted the communion between the human and the nature; this asseveration of Environmental and Postcolonial Feminists strengthens the ground with the tours de force and commodification of the land in the recent times. The theoretical perspective supplied with the literary characterization here in this research would try to have an understanding of the co-relations of class and gender exploitation and environmental destructions for the craving of accumulation dominating the minds of imperialist human. To have a conceptual clarity of the commodity aspect of imperialist nature of the community, here, two texts are critiqued: Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things and Kamala Markandaya’s Nectar in a Sieve. Undoubtedly the analysis will go through the structural principles which explicit the layered complexity and binary view of man/woman, culture/nature which by and large centres the discussion on the patriarchal ideology that formulates the ground for capitalistic imperialism. In order to understand the novels completely with the surface meaning and the demystification of the historical aspects undermined, the research would develop a strategy which might be described as “negative dialectics of environmental feminism”. At the same time the work would strive to resist mythologizing identity, nature, and history and thus will demonstrate that praxis is possible even in a thoroughly commodified world. Keywords: Commodification, Ecofeminism, Ecological Criticism, Feminism, Imperialism, Post Colonialism

Editor reviews

1 reviews

Reviewed by Editorial Board
(Updated: January 13, 2020)
Overall rating 
 
3.6
Expertise 
 
3.0
Relevancy 
 
4.0
Presentation 
 
4.0
Fulfills all criteria
Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0

User reviews

1 reviews

Overall rating 
 
3.4
Expertise 
 
4.0  (1)
Relevancy 
 
3.0  (1)
Presentation 
 
3.0  (1)
To write a review please register or
My quick review
Overall rating 
 
3.4
Expertise 
 
4.0
Relevancy 
 
3.0
Presentation 
 
3.0
Please publish
MK
Report this review Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0
 
     
Forgot Login?   Sign up  

Choose Archives

advertise with us 1