Slide background
Slide background

Journals come in both print and online editions. You can submit your articles by any one of the following three methods: 1. You can send the full papers/articles directly to our gmail id: issnjournals2u@gmail.com (Or) 2.Register/Login to Submit/Browse Journal & Events Listings with full control (Or) 3. Submit papers/articles without registration by clicking here.
For any assistance, please call/whatsapp us over our mobile numbers: +919245777148 / +919486068813

COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TEACHING IN THEORY AND PRACTICE: AN OVERVIEW (Pages 169-179) by Mr. Satyawan Polist in THE ENGLISH RESEARCH EXPRESS / ISSN:2321-1164 (Online); 2347-2642 (Print)

MS Updated
 
3.6
 
3.3 (1)
485 0 0 0 1 0

Journals

Please Login
To view the complete details of the Journal, please login.
Article Number
ERE.2013/4Th.Qr-18/169.179/78
Publication Year

Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) also known as Communicative Approach emerged as a dominant paradigm in Western ELT in the late twentieth century. The communicative approach is based on the theory of language as communication. It underlies the idea that when learners are involved in real communication, their natural strategies for language acquisition will be used, and this will allow them to learn to use the language. The CLT emphasizes meaning and genuine communication in the classroom with an objective to develop communicative competence. CLT has been exported and promoted around the world in a variety of cultural and educational contexts with greater or lesser degree of success. Although there has been widespread support for CLT across the world, its adoption in non-Western context is problematic. CLT is not considered appropriate for all cultures and contexts. Key Words: Communicative Competence, linguistic competence, functional-notional, CLT, paradigm

Editor reviews

1 reviews

Reviewed by Editorial Board
(Updated: January 11, 2020)
Overall rating 
 
3.6
Expertise 
 
3.0
Relevancy 
 
4.0
Presentation 
 
4.0
Fulfills all criteria
Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0

User reviews

1 reviews

Overall rating 
 
3.3
Expertise 
 
3.0  (1)
Relevancy 
 
4.0  (1)
Presentation 
 
3.0  (1)
To write a review please register or
Reviewed by my side
Overall rating 
 
3.3
Expertise 
 
3.0
Relevancy 
 
4.0
Presentation 
 
3.0
You can believe this review
MS
Report this review Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0
 
     
Forgot Login?   Sign up  

Choose Archives

advertise with us 1