Slide background
Slide background

Journals come in both print and online editions. You can submit your articles by any one of the following three methods: 1. You can send the full papers/articles directly to our gmail id: issnjournals2u@gmail.com (Or) 2.Register/Login to Submit/Browse Journal & Events Listings with full control (Or) 3. Submit papers/articles without registration by clicking here.
For any assistance, please call/whatsapp us over our mobile numbers: +919245777148 / +919486068813

MUTUAL UNDERSTANDING OF HUMAN AND ANIMAL THROUGH ECOCRITICAL ELEMENTS AS REFLECTED IN RUSSELL HOBAN’S 'TURTLE DIARY', CAROLYN PARKHURST’S 'DOGS OF BABEL' AND YANN MARTEL’S 'LIFE OF PI' (Pages 46-57) by Ms.T.Monika* and Dr. G. Ruby** in THE ENGLISH RESEARCH EXPRESS / ISSN:2321-1164 (Online); 2347-2642 (Print)

MA Updated
 
3.7
 
3.3 (1)
398 0 0 0 1 0

Journals

Please Login
To view the complete details of the Journal, please login.
Article Number
ERE.2014/3Rd.Qr-06/46.57/179
Publication Year

Ecocriticism is a new branch of literature which is grounded in ecology, natural history and environmental studies. Eco is short of ecology, which is concerned with the relationships between living organisms in their natural environment as well as their relationships with that Environment. Selective attention to animals and nature was probably essential to early humans, whose survival depended on their ability to locate resources, track prey and avoid predators. The inclusion of animals and animal imagery in education tends to be motivating and beneficial for the children. In the field of human-animal interactions, a popular theory termed ‘biophilia’ suggests that humans may be hardwired to attend to animals and the natural world. My paper focuses this note with the novels of Russell Hoban’s Turtle Diary, Carolyn Parkhurst’s Dogs of Babel and Yann Martel’s Life of Pi. Keywords: human-animal relationship, anthropomorphism, zoomorphism, cognition, survival etc.

Editor reviews

1 reviews

Reviewed by Editorial Board
(Updated: January 19, 2020)
Overall rating 
 
3.7
Expertise 
 
4.0
Relevancy 
 
3.0
Presentation 
 
4.0
Fulfills all criteria
Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0

User reviews

1 reviews

Overall rating 
 
3.3
Expertise 
 
3.0  (1)
Relevancy 
 
4.0  (1)
Presentation 
 
3.0  (1)
To write a review please register or
Reviewed by us today
Overall rating 
 
3.3
Expertise 
 
3.0
Relevancy 
 
4.0
Presentation 
 
3.0
Let us know further
MA
Report this review Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0
 
     
Forgot Login?   Sign up  

Choose Archives

advertise with us 1