Slide background
Slide background

Journals come in both print and online editions. You can submit your articles by any one of the following three methods: 1. You can send the full papers/articles directly to our gmail id: issnjournals2u@gmail.com (Or) 2.Register/Login to Submit/Browse Journal & Events Listings with full control (Or) 3. Submit papers/articles without registration by clicking here.
For any assistance, please call/whatsapp us over our mobile numbers: +919245777148 / +919486068813

PURSUIT OF LINGUISTIC FREEDOM IN THE FICTION OF MULK RAJ ANAND (Pages 146-155) by Dr. Dilip K. Sasmal in THE ENGLISH RESEARCH EXPRESS / ISSN:2321-1164 (Online); 2347-2642 (Print)

DD Updated
 
3.3
 
3.7 (1)
472 0 0 0 1 0
Write Review Add to favorites Follow

Journals

Please Login
To view the complete details of the Journal, please login.
Article Number
ERE.2017/2Nd.Qr-17/146.155/432
Publication Year
2017 2nd Quarter
Author Name
Dr. Dilip K. Sasmal

Mulk Raj Anand stepped forward to blend indigenous words and phrases with English with a clear sense of purpose. He borrowed freely from Indian languages to create a novel vehicle of expression in order to portray the realities of Indian society. He renews the language he writes in by coining new words and phrases or even by combining old expressions in unforeseen ways. He creates this freedom for himself, as he finds the traditional language or style inadequate or unsuitable for the ideas, images and feelings he wants to communicate. This kind of artistic liberty goes well with the ideal of freedom that he has been trying to achieve. He uses a wide range of Indian words and phrases in most of his writings. The freedom of expression that he exercises might at times seem to be rather stridently voiced; however, on a closer look, the reader realises that this sort of device helps project a faithful picture of Indian life, with all its squalor, turmoil and also broad-heartedness. Keywords: Indigenous words, realities of Indian society, traditional language or style inadequate or unsuitable for the ideas, artistic liberty, freedom of expression etc.

Editor reviews

1 reviews

Reviewed by Editorial Board
Overall rating 
 
3.3
Expertise 
 
3.0
Relevancy 
 
4.0
Presentation 
 
3.0
Fulfills All Criteria
admin
#1 Reviewer 1401 reviews
Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0

User reviews

1 reviews

Overall rating 
 
3.7
Expertise 
 
4.0  (1)
Relevancy 
 
4.0  (1)
Presentation 
 
3.0  (1)
To write a review please register or
Reviewed by me alone
Overall rating 
 
3.7
Expertise 
 
4.0
Relevancy 
 
4.0
Presentation 
 
3.0
Hope this will be published at the earliest
DD
Report this review Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0
 
      Forgot Login?   Sign up  

Choose Category

Choose Archives

advertise with us 1