Slide background
Slide background

Journals come in both print and online editions. You can submit your articles by any one of the following three methods: 1. You can send the full papers/articles directly to our gmail id: issnjournals2u@gmail.com (Or) 2.Register/Login to Submit/Browse Journal & Events Listings with full control (Or) 3. Submit papers/articles without registration by clicking here.
For any assistance, please call/whatsapp us over our mobile numbers: +919245777148 / +919486068813

THE CONTRIBUTION OF SAUSSURE AND HIS STRUCTURE IN LITERARY THEORY: A BRIEF STUDY (Pages 97-107) by Ms. Runoo Ravi in THE ENGLISH RESEARCH EXPRESS / ISSN:2321-1164 (Online); 2347-2642 (Print)

MR Updated
 
3.3
 
3.7 (1)
464 0 0 0 1 0

Journals

Please Login
To view the complete details of the Journal, please login.
Article Number
ERE.2016/1St.Qr-13/97.107/322
Publication Year
Author Name

Saussure tried to study language as a structure and claimed that ‘all language items are essentially interlinked’. This aspect of language, the chief tool for communication had not been studied earlier. Saussure insisted that language was actually a carefully built structure of interwoven elements. He further explained that language was composed of units called sign. The concrete distinction and the relative importance of Langue and Parole given by him later became a very strong base for individual interpretations and inferences that helped in ushering a lot of ‘unconventional’, ‘innovative’ and ‘idiosyncratic’ ideas later, emphasizing on the ‘individual within the ‘structure’. Furthermore, Saussure had also established a very important point; the relation between the signifier and the signified was completely arbitrary. The structures had been constructed but the meaning contained within the structure was still to be discovered. This led to the development of the later theories prevalent today. Keywords: Structure, Signifier, Signified, Binary Opposites, Deconstruction, Discourse, Silences.

Editor reviews

1 reviews

Reviewed by Editorial Board
Overall rating 
 
3.3
Expertise 
 
3.0
Relevancy 
 
4.0
Presentation 
 
3.0
Fulfills All Criteria
Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0

User reviews

1 reviews

Overall rating 
 
3.7
Expertise 
 
4.0  (1)
Relevancy 
 
4.0  (1)
Presentation 
 
3.0  (1)
To write a review please register or
My honest review
Overall rating 
 
3.7
Expertise 
 
4.0
Relevancy 
 
4.0
Presentation 
 
3.0
Can be continued
MR
Report this review Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0
 
     
Forgot Login?   Sign up  

Choose Archives

advertise with us 1