Slide background
Slide background

Journals come in both print and online editions. You can submit your articles by any one of the following three methods: 1. You can send the full papers/articles directly to our gmail id: issnjournals2u@gmail.com (Or) 2.Register/Login to Submit/Browse Journal & Events Listings with full control (Or) 3. Submit papers/articles without registration by clicking here.
For any assistance, please call/whatsapp us over our mobile numbers: +919245777148 / +919486068813

A REVIEW OF ELT METHODOLOGY IN INDIA: A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE (Pages 141-163) by Dr. Venkata Ratnam Uppuleti in THE INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH SPECIALIST / ISSN: 2350-1499 (Online); 2350-0751 (Print)

DV Updated
 
3.4
 
3.7 (1)
555 0 0 0 1 0
Write Review Add to favorites Follow

Journals

Please Login
To view the complete details of the Journal, please login.
Publication Year
2016 4th Quarter
Author Name
Dr. Venkata Ratnam Uppuleti

This research articles sets a conceptual framework within which the study is carried out. This is done by providing a historical background and surveying contemporary research and published work in the ELT area. At the outset a brief discussed English teaching Methods workout in India, is attempted to determine the status of ELT methods in our country. A review of Course books and Testing of spoken English leads to a discussion of the implication of these for the present study. Language teaching is an ancient discipline. However as Jadeja says, 'when we think of ELT. Certain well defined trends in methodological approaches to second language teaching can be discerned throughout this period. A study of these major changes in methodological approaches is done with a view to ascertaining the focus and status given to listening/speaking. The present paper deals with different methods with specific focus on the place of speaking and listening, besides presenting the general features of each approach/method. Keywords: Collapsers, Disclaimers, Functions of Language, Genre, Interactional Metadiscourse,

Editor reviews

1 reviews

Reviewed by Editorial Board
Overall rating 
 
3.4
Expertise 
 
4.0
Relevancy 
 
3.0
Presentation 
 
3.0
Fulfills All Criteria
admin
#1 Reviewer 1401 reviews
Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0

User reviews

1 reviews

Overall rating 
 
3.7
Expertise 
 
4.0  (1)
Relevancy 
 
4.0  (1)
Presentation 
 
3.0  (1)
To write a review please register or
Reviewed by me alone
Overall rating 
 
3.7
Expertise 
 
4.0
Relevancy 
 
4.0
Presentation 
 
3.0
Hope this will be published at the earliest
DV
Report this review Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0
 
      Forgot Login?   Sign up  

Choose Category

Choose Archives

advertise with us 1