Slide background
Slide background

Journals come in both print and online editions. You can submit your articles by any one of the following three methods: 1. You can send the full papers/articles directly to our gmail id: issnjournals2u@gmail.com (Or) 2.Register/Login to Submit/Browse Journal & Events Listings with full control (Or) 3. Submit papers/articles without registration by clicking here.
For any assistance, please call/whatsapp us over our mobile numbers: +919245777148 / +919486068813

AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF WASHBACK EFFECT ON TEACHING METHODOLOGY OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHERS (Pages 46-72) by Mr. J. Joseph John Kennady *and Dr. J. John Love Joy** in THE INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH SPECIALIST / ISSN: 2350-1499 (Online); 2350-0751 (Print)

MJ Updated
 
3.4
 
3.4 (1)
402 0 0 0 1 0

Journals

Please Login
To view the complete details of the Journal, please login.
Publication Year

Washback is known as the impact of testing on teaching and learning. It can be either positive or negative. However, the testing in the colleges decides the way the teachers teach. This study evaluates the influence of University Semester Examination washback effect on teachers’ selection of teaching methodology to teach English language as Part II subject at undergraduate level in the districts of Sivagangai and Ramnad. The survey was taken with 100 college English teachers. The research tools used in this survey are document analysis, printed questionnaire and interviews with focus group. The data reveals that teachers’ teaching methodology is directly influenced by the University semester examinations. Keywords: Washback effect, teaching methodology

Editor reviews

1 reviews

Reviewed by Editorial Board
(Updated: January 29, 2020)
Overall rating 
 
3.4
Expertise 
 
4.0
Relevancy 
 
3.0
Presentation 
 
3.0
Fulfills all criteria
Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0

User reviews

1 reviews

Overall rating 
 
3.4
Expertise 
 
4.0  (1)
Relevancy 
 
3.0  (1)
Presentation 
 
3.0  (1)
To write a review please register or
Reviewed by us and friends
Overall rating 
 
3.4
Expertise 
 
4.0
Relevancy 
 
3.0
Presentation 
 
3.0
You can believe this review
MJ
Report this review Comments (0) | Was this review helpful to you? 0 0
 
     
Forgot Login?   Sign up  

Choose Archives

advertise with us 1